Ocorreu um erro. Detalhes Ocultar
Você tem páginas não gravadas. Restaurar Cancelar

República Democrática Popular da Coreia do Norte

  • Líder Supremo:Kim Jong-un
  • Premier:Pak Pong-ju
  • Capital:Pyongyang
  • Línguas:Korean
  • Governo
  • Estatísticas Nacionais Oficias:No data
  • População, pessoas:25.549.819 (2018)
  • Área, km2:120.410
  • PIB per capita, US$:No data
  • PIB, bilhões em US$ atuais:No data
  • Índice de GINI:No data
  • Facilidade para Fazer Negócios:No data
Todos os conjuntos de dados:  A I M N S U W
  • A
    • setembro 2019
      Fonte: Food and Agriculture Organization
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 04 setembro, 2019
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      AQUASTAT is FAO's global information system on water and agriculture, developed by the Land and Water Division. The main mandate of the program is to collect, analyze and disseminate information on water resources, water uses, and agricultural water management with an emphasis on countries in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean. This allows interested users to find comprehensive and regularly updated information at global, regional, and national levels.
    • janeiro 2014
      Fonte: World Resources Institute
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 07 dezembro, 2015
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      This dataset shows countries and river basins' average exposure to five of Aqueduct's water risk indicators: baseline water stress, interannual variability, seasonal variability, flood occurrence, and drought severity. Risk exposure scores are available for every country (except Greenland and Antarctica), the 100 most populous river basins, and the 100 largest river basins by area. Scores are also available for all industrial, agricultural, and domestic users' average exposure to each indicator in each country and river basin. Citation: Gassert, F., P. Reig, T. Luo, and A. Maddocks. 2013. “Aqueduct country and river basin rankings: a weighted aggregation of spatially distinct hydrological indicators.” Working paper. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, November 2013. Available online at http://wri.org/publication/aqueduct-country-river-basin-rankings.
    • agosto 2015
      Fonte: World Resources Institute
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 25 março, 2019
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      Suggested citation: Luo, T., R. Young, and P. Reig. 2015. "Aqueduct projected water stress rankings." Technical note. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, August 215. Available online at http://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-projected-water-stress-country-rankings.    Supplemental Materials: Country Scores                         WRI projected future country-level water stress for 2020, 2030, and 2040 under business-as-usual (BAU), optimistic, and pessimistic scenarios. Each tab lists country projected water stress scores for each scenario and year, weighted by overall water withdrawals. Scores weighted by individual sectors (agricultural, domestic, and industrial) are provided as well.   These global projections are best suited to making comparisons among countries for the same year and among scenarios and decades for the same region. More detailed and localized data or scenarios can better estimate potential outcomes for specific regions and expose large sub-national variations that are subsumed under countrywide water-stress values. The country indicators face persistent limitations in attempting to simplify complex information, such as spatial and temporal variations, into a single number. They also do not account for the governance and investment structure of the water sector in different countries.    It is important to note the inherent uncertainty in estimating any future conditions, particularly those associated with climate change, future population and economic trends, and water demand. Additionally, care should be taken when examining the change rates of a country’s projected stress levels between one year and another, because the risk-score thresholds are not linear. For more information on these limitations, see the technical note.   Projections are described in further detail in: Luck, M., M. Landis, and F. Gassert, “Aqueduct Water Stress Projections: Decadal Projections of Water Supply and Demand Using CMIP5 GCMs,” Technical note (Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, April 2015), http://www.wri.org/publication/aqueduct-water-stress-projections.   Water Stress withdrawals / available flow Water stress measures total annual water withdrawals (municipal, industrial, and agricultural) expressed as a percentage of the total annual available blue water. Higher values indicate more competition among users. Score Value [0-1) Low (<10%) [1-2) Low to medium (10-20%) [2-3) Medium to high (20-40%) [3-4) High (40-80%) [4-5] Extremely high (>80%)    
  • I
    • outubro 2015
      Fonte: Water FootPrint Network
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 27 outubro, 2015
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: International virtual water flow statistics  Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/international-virtual-water-flow-statistics/ Reference: Hoekstra, A.Y. & Mekonnen, M.M. (2012) The water footprint of humanity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9): 3232–3237 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
  • M
    • março 2019
      Fonte: World Bank
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 20 março, 2019
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      Data cited at: The World Bank https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/ Topic: Millennium Development Goals Publication: https://datacatalog.worldbank.org/dataset/millennium-development-goals License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/   Relevant indicators drawn from the World Development Indicators, reorganized according to the goals and targets of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). The MDGs focus the efforts of the world community on achieving significant, measurable improvements in people's lives by the year 2015: they establish targets and yardsticks for measuring development results. Gender Parity Index (GPI)= Value of indicator for Girls/ Value of indicator for Boys. For e.g GPI=School enrolment for Girls/School enrolment for Boys. A value of less than one indicates differences in favor of boys, whereas a value near one (1) indicates that parity has been more or less achieved. The greater the deviation from 1 greater the disparity is.
  • N
    • outubro 2015
      Fonte: Water FootPrint Network
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 26 outubro, 2015
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: National water footprint statistics Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/national-water-footprint-statistics/ Water footprints of national consumption (1996-2005) Reference: Hoekstra, A.Y. & Mekonnen, M.M. (2012) 'The water footprint of humanity’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9): 3232–3237. Water footprints of national production (1996-2005) Reference: Hoekstra, A.Y. & Mekonnen, M.M. (2012) 'The water footprint of humanity’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(9): 3232–3237. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
  • S
    • setembro 2019
      Fonte: Social Progress Imperative
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 14 outubro, 2019
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
        Data cited at: Social Progress Index https://www.socialprogress.org/download The Social Progress Index is a new way to define the success of our societies. It is a comprehensive measure of real quality of life, independent of economic indicators. The Social Progress Index is designed to complement, rather than replace, economic measures such as GDP. Each year, Social Progress Imperative conducts a comprehensive review of all indicators included in the Social Progress Index framework to check data updates (which frequently include retroactive revisions) and whether new indicators have been published that are well-suited to describing social progress concepts. Such a review necessitates a recalculation of previously published versions of the Social Progress Index, as any removal or additions of indicators to the framework or changes due to retroactive revisions in data from the original data sources prevent comparability between previously published versions of the Social Progress Index and the 2019 Social Progress Index. Therefore, using the 2019 Social Progress Index framework and methodology, we provide comparable historical data for additional five years of the Social Progress Index, from 2014 to 2018.
    • abril 2019
      Fonte: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 12 abril, 2019
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
    • junho 2019
      Fonte: Sustainable Development Solutions Network
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 09 julho, 2019
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      Data Cited at - Sachs, J., Schmidt-Traub, G., Kroll, C., Lafortune, G., Fuller, G. (2019): Sustainable Development Report 2019. New York: Bertelsmann Stiftung and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN). The 2019 SDG Index and Dashboards report presents a revised and updated assessment of countries’ distance to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). It includes detailed SDG Dashboards to help identify implementation priorities for the SDGs. The report also provides a ranking of countries by the aggregate SDG Index of overall performance.
  • U
    • setembro 2018
      Fonte: United Nations Environment Programme
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 22 outubro, 2018
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
    • julho 2017
      Fonte: United Nations Children's Fund
      Carregamento por: Sandeep Reddy
      Acesso em 23 agosto, 2017
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      According to UNICEF report, in 2015, seven out of ten people used a safely managed drinking water service. Universal access to safe drinking water is a fundamental need and human right. Securing access for all would go a long way in reducing illness and death, especially among children. Since 2000, 1.4 billion people have gained access to basic drinking water services, such as piped water into the home or a protected dug well. In 2015, 844 million people still lack a basic water service and among them almost 159 million people still collected drinking water directly from rivers, lakes and other surface water sources. The data reveal pronounced disparities, with the poorest and those living in rural areas least likely to use a basic service. “Safely managed” water services represent an ambitious new rung on the ladder used to track progress on drinking water. In 2015, 5.2 billion people used safely managed services, i.e. accessible on premises, available when needed and free from contamination. A further 1.3 billion used a ‘basic’ water service, i.e. improved sources within 30 minutes per round trip to collect water. Over a quarter of a billion (258 million) used a ‘limited’ service where water collection from an improved source exceeded 30 minutes. In most countries the burden of water collection continues to fall mainly to women and girls.
  • W
    • setembro 2015
      Fonte: Water FootPrint Network
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 27 outubro, 2015
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: Product water footprint statistics Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/product-water-footprint-statistics/ Reference: Mekonnen, M.M. & Hoekstra, A.Y. (2012) A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products, Ecosystems, 15(3): 401–415. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/  
    • setembro 2015
      Fonte: Water FootPrint Network
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 27 outubro, 2015
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados
      Data cited at: The Water Footprint Network https://waterfootprint.org/en/ Topic: Product water footprint statistics Publication: https://waterfootprint.org/en/resources/waterstat/product-water-footprint-statistics/ Reference: Mekonnen, M.M. & Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011) National water footprint accounts: the green, blue and grey water footprint of production and consumption, Value of Water Research Report Series No.50, UNESCO-IHE, Delft, the Netherlands. License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/  
    • julho 2017
      Fonte: World Health Organization
      Carregamento por: Knoema
      Acesso em 08 fevereiro, 2018
      Selecionar Conjunto de dados

Nossa declaração de privacidade e política de cookies

O nosso website utiliza cookies para facilitar a sua experiência online. Eles foram salvos no seu computador quando você lançou este site. Você pode modificar suas configurações pessoais para cookies através das configurações do seu navegador de Internet.

Política de Privacidade